How Sentinel compares

Everyone watches half the chain.

The defensive market is split by telemetry domain, not by attack. Identity tools see the stolen session. Pipeline and supply-chain tools see the workflow. Each is excellent at its half — and blind at the hand-off where real attacks cross. Here's who covers what.

covers it partial / adjacent not its domain
Tool Category Sees identity
compromise
Sees pipeline
integrity
Correlates both
(one kill chain)
Push Security / GripIdentity / ITDR
StepSecurity (Harden-Runner)CI/CD runtime
Cycode / Legit / Apiiro / OXASPM / pipeline posture
GitGuardianSecrets / NHI
Snyk / SocketSCA / OSS packages
GitHub Advanced SecurityNative scanning
BlueFlag SecuritySDLC identity / behavior
Microsoft Defender (full stack)XDR
SentinelCross-domain detection

Our read of publicly documented capabilities, mid-2026. "Partial" means a tool touches the domain from one angle (e.g. ASPM tools score developer behavior but don't ingest identity-threat signals; GitGuardian sees secrets but not the human session). BlueFlag is the closest single competitor; Microsoft Defender can correlate identity + pipeline but only for all-in Microsoft shops, not GitHub-native teams. Categories simplified for clarity — happy to go deeper on any row.

Why no one closes the seam

It isn't an oversight — it's structural. The two domains consume different telemetry (browser/IdP sessions vs. runner/SCM/process signals) and sell to different buyers (identity teams vs. AppSec/platform teams). Incumbents are anchored to their signal source and their budget line. Bridging means ingesting both signal types and reasoning across them — a different product shape, not a feature an existing tool bolts on.

Sentinel is built for that one job: correlate the identity anomaly, the unlinked workflow change, and the novel egress into a single, same-hour incident — for GitHub-native teams that don't have a 24/7 SOC stitching it together by hand.

Become a design partner →